What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties objective intent to contract?

Describe your nutrition education teaching session with your patient and/or their family.
July 25, 2020
Explain Evaluating Sources.
July 25, 2020

What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties objective intent to contract?

the Theory to Practice section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text.Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the Theory to Practice section, and complete the following in your response: your answers.Read This to answe the questionsBig Time Toymaker (BTT) develops, manufactures, and distributes board games and other toys to the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Chou is the inventor of a new strategy game he named . BTT was interested in distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou whereby BTT paid him $25,000 in exchange for rights for a 90-day period. The exclusive negotiation agreement stipulated that no contract existed unless it was in writing. Just three days before the expiration of the 90-day period, the parties reached an oral distribution agreement at a meeting. Chou offered to draft the contract that would memorialize their agreement. Before Chou drafted the agreement, a BTT manager sent Chou an e-mail with the subject line Strat Deal that repeated the key terms of the distribution agreement including price, time frames, and obligations of both parties. Although the e-mail never used the word , it stated that all of the terms had been agreed upon. Chou believed that this e-mail was meant to replace the earlier notion that he should draft a contract, and one month passed. BTT then sent Chou a fax requesting that he send a draft for a distribution agreement contract. Despite the fact that Chou did so immediately after receiving the BTT fax, several more months passed without response from BTT. BTT had a change in management and informed Chou they were not interested in distributing Strat.