What are some positive externalities of a strong dollar that may help avoid market failure for some industries

Define and explain the elements that make TCO
July 9, 2020
Identify the essential elements required for the formation of a valid contract and define each and whether a contract was created
July 9, 2020

What are some positive externalities of a strong dollar that may help avoid market failure for some industries

Roman","serif";”>1)  What are some positive externalities of a strong dollar that may help avoid market failure for some industries?

Roman","serif";”>Notes from the text

Roman","serif";”>An externality arises when a person engages in an activity that influences the well-being of a bystander but neither pays nor receives any compensation for that effect. If the impact on the bystander is adverse, it is called a negative externality. If it is beneficial, it is called a positive externality. In the presence of externalities, society’s interest in a market outcome extends beyond the well-being of buyers and sellers who participate in the market to include the well-being of bystanders who are affected indirectly. Because buyers and sellers neglect the external effects of their actions when deciding how much to demand or supply, the market equilibrium is not efficient when there are externalities. That is, the equilibrium fails to maximize the total benefit to society as a whole. The release of dioxin into the environment, for instance, is a negative externality. Self-interested paper firms will not consider the full cost of the pollution they create in their production process, and consumers of paper will not consider the full cost of the pollution they contribute from their purchasing decisions. Therefore, the firms will emit too much pollution unless the government prevents or discourages them from doing so.

Roman","serif";”>Externality
Roman","serif";”>– the uncompensated impact of one person’s actions on the well-being of a bystander

Roman","serif";”>Externalities come in many varieties, as do the policy responses that try to deal with the market failure. Here are some examples:


Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";”>       

Roman","serif";”>                    • The exhaust from automobiles is a negative externality because it creates smog that other people have to breathe. As a result of this externality, drivers tend to pollute too much. The federal government attempts to solve this problem by setting emission standards for cars. It also taxes gasoline to reduce the amount that people drive.


Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";”>       

Roman","serif";”>                    • Restored historic buildings convey a positive externality because people who walk or ride by them can enjoy the beauty and the sense of history that these buildings provide. Building owners do not get the full benefit of restoration and, therefore, tend to discard older buildings too quickly. Many local governments respond to this problem by regulating the destruction of historic buildings and by providing tax breaks to owners who restore them.


Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";”>       

Roman","serif";”>                    • Barking dogs create a negative externality because neighbors are disturbed by the noise. Dog owners do not bear the full cost of the noise and, therefore, tend to take too few precautions to prevent their dogs from barking. Local governments address this problem by making it illegal to disturb the peace.


Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";”>       

Roman","serif";”>                    • Research into new technologies provides a positive externality because it creates knowledge that other people can use. Because inventors cannot capture the full benefits of their inventions, they tend to devote too few resources to research. The federal government addresses this problem partially through the patent system, which gives inventors exclusive use of their inventions for a limited time.

Roman","serif";”>In each of these cases, some decision maker fails to take account of the external effects of his or her behavior. The government responds by trying to influence this behavior to protect the interests of bystanders.