This is my question on my Philosophy class. Here it is:

What is the argument Luban offers for the hybrid war-law model? What is the argument he offers against it? Which side of the argument is more compatible with respect for human rights? What do you mean when you say ‘right?” Does it matter which side is more compatible with respect for human rights? Explain.

Cite all the texts you employ. This is a 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more. In offering your own judgment and defense, use course concepts.

Need assistance with this?