Description

A current “hot topic” is the same-sex marriage debate. Analyze John Finnis’ criticisms of legalizing same sex marriage, as well as John Oorvino’s criticism of the natural law position. In your discussion, note when natural law arguments, utilitarian arguments or human rights are the main justification. Do any pros or cons remain unexplained by Finnis or Corvino? Where do you stand in this public debate, and why?