ritically evaluate whether the following can be said to illustrate Dubnick’s preferred notion of accountability or that of Habermas or that of Mulgan
QNT 561 WEEK 4
June 30, 2020cognitive psychology ackademick only
June 30, 2020ritically evaluate whether the following can be said to illustrate Dubnick’s preferred notion of accountability or that of Habermas or that of Mulgan
Critically evaluate whether the following can be said to illustrate Dubnick’s preferred notion of accountability or that of Habermas or that of Mulgan or that of Philp or that of Bovens:
2014 testimony of Kevin Rudd before the Royal Commission into the Home Insulation Program
2014 testimony of Peter Garrett before the Royal Commission into the Home Insulation Program
Allan Hawke, April 2010, Review of the Administration of the Home Insulation Program http://www.ee.ret.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/04_2013/home-insulation-hawke-report-pdf.pdf
Senate Environment, Communications and the Arts References Committee, July 2010, Energy Efficient Homes Package http://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/senate/committee/eca_ctte/eehp/report/report.pdf
Australian National Audit Office, Report No. 12, 2010-2011 Home Insulation Program http://www.anao.gov.au/~/media/Uploads/Documents/2010%2011_audit_report_no_12.pdf
Word limit: 3000 words
Due Date: 3 September
Weight: 35%
—————————————————————————–
Dear All,
Reminder: Assignment 1 is due Wednesday, 3 September, 23:59 pm
Objective: demonstrate your mastery of the 5 theoretical approaches (Habermas; Dubnick; Mulgan; Philp; Bovens) by analysing the 5 readings (Garrett; Rudd; Allan Hawke’s Review; Senate Reference Committee Report/July 2010; ANAO Report No. 12) in light of the theories and presenting an argument about which theoretical approach(es ) underpin/can be found in those reaings
NOTE: a particular theory may be found in more than one of the readings; and any particular reading may illustrate more than one of the theories.
DO NOT provide a summary of the HIP events or provide other research that canvasses which of the 5 views is your or ‘the’ preferred view. Such a summary/further research
–will waste valuable words
–will suggest that you are avoiding demonstrating your mastery of the theories or demonstrating
your mastery of the capacity to apply the theories to contemporary documents not contemplated by any of the theorists
Note: You are welcome to indicate your preferred theory & why you prefer it but this is not required by the assignment.
——————————————————————————-
Dear Elizabeth and All,
http://congressional.proquest.com:8090/citetestimony_ref.html
The closest suggestion is for transcripts of US Congress committee hearings:
Citing Testimony (Transcribed or Written)
Database Information
This database contains transcripts of congressional committee hearings. These transcripts cover both statements of witnesses and the question and answer (Q&A) sessions between witnesses and Members of Congress.
For each citation, include:
U.S. Congress†and the committee or subcommittee name use the name of the committee as supplied within the transcript; this will typically include the words House†or Senate†and the phrase Hearing of the †as part of the committee name. These phrases should be included exactly as given. This information is usually contained in the headline†of the document.
Headline (or title) provides the subject of the committee hearing; use the headline exactly as provided within the transcript
Witness name the affiliation or title of a witness can be omitted, particularly if the affiliation or title is not official; witness names can also be entered last name first (for example, Albright, Madeline K.) to maintain an alphabetical arrangement of works by a single author within a bibliography. (This applies only to citations from Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony).
Hearing date
Database name (Text from:) there are several sources included in this database: FDCH Political Transcripts; Federal Information System Corporation Federal News Service; Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony; CQ Transcriptions.
Web service name (Available from: ProQuest® Congressional)
Date accessed by the user (Accessed: date)
For example:
U.S. Congress. House Ways and Means Committee. Holds Hearing on the 1993 Gasoline Tax.†(Date: 5/8/96). Text from: FDCH Political Transcripts. Available from: ProQuest® Congressional; Accessed 10/15/98.
U.S. Congress. Hearing of the Military Personnel Subcommittee of the House National Security Committee. POW/MIA Issues.†(Date: 6/19/96). Text from: Federal Information System Corporation Federal News Service. Available from: ProQuest® Congressional; Accessed 10/15/98.
Madeleine K. Albright (U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Dept. of State). Testimony on FY97, Commerce/Justice/State Appropriations before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies.†(Date: 5/23/96). Text from: Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony. Available from: ProQuest® Congressional; Accessed 10/15/98.
Specific quote contained in the transcript
Since a hearing transcript may contain the statements and Q&A of committee members and witnesses, it may be necessary to quote a specific statement within the transcript. The database does not provide page or screen numbers. To quote a specific statement or segment within the transcript, provide the name of the person being quoted and the specific hearing transcript.
< pstyle=" font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans,
