Realists often describe the international system as anarchic
How accurate or useful is this description? what are the implication of anarchy for IR theory an practice? in your answer, refer specifically to the realist concept of the security dilemma? what do realists mean by this concept? is it still relevant to IR today? finally, what would be the main differences between a realists, a constructivist, liberal and an English school understanding of, and response to, security dilemma?