Topic: RACQ HRD Needs Analysis

This is an HRD( Human resource development) Needs analysis so the format should be a report to a manager in a business environment. so can use report style.
The case of Organisation was RACQ which is an Australia insurance company so u can check there official website to get know about it
MGN431 Strategic HRD: Assessment Item 1 HRD Needs Analysis (40%)
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
High Distinction    Distinction    Credit    Pass    Fail
KS (1.1) Well-researched knowledge and critical understanding applied to issues at the forefront of a specialised discipline area
Demonstration of current knowledge of Strategic Human Resource Development (SHRD) issues and approaches

Weighting: 15/40    Full critical exploration of SHRD theories, issues and approaches is demonstrated through discipline knowledge that is well-researched, current and comprehensive.    Some critical exploration of SHRD theories, issues and approaches is demonstrated through discipline knowledge that is well-researched, current and relevant.    Some critical exploration of SHRD theories, issues and approaches is demonstrated through well- researched discipline knowledge, though there are some gaps of recency and relevance.      An attempt at critical exploration of SHRD theories, issues and approaches is demonstrated through adequately-researched discipline knowledge, though there are gaps of recency and relevance.      There is little/no critical exploration of SHRD theories, issues and approaches, and little/no current discipline knowledge demonstrated.
CTA (2.1) Apply logical, critical and creative thinking and judgement to generate appropriate solutions to problems in the disciplinary context
Analysis of the relevant critical issues  present in the case organisation in terms of their impact on SHRD

Weighting:15/40    Superior analysis is conducted of the relevant critical issues present in the case organisation.  The analysis also demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the current business strategy and the SHRD issues relating to the strategy.    A well supported analysis is conducted of the relevant issues present in the case organisation.  The analysis also demonstrates a solid understanding of the current business strategy and the SHRD issues relating to the strategy.    A sound analysis is conducted of the relevant issues present in the case organisation.  The analysis also demonstrates a sound understanding of the current business strategy and the SHRD issues relating to the strategy but there are gaps or lack of detail.    An attempt at analysis of the relevant issues present in the case organisation.  The analysis demonstrates a limited understanding of the current business strategy and the SHRD issues relating to the strategy.  There are significant gaps or lack of detail.    Little attempt at analysis of the issues present in the case organisation. Content is a description rather than a critique and analysis and may be general rather than applied to the case organisation.  Little or no application to the specific organisation.
PC (3.1) Ability to create and present professional documents and/or reports using high levels of analysis/synthesis/evaluation for a range of contexts and audiences
Structure and presentation of analysis

Weighting 5/40    The analysis is professionally presented with substantial attention to detailand high standards of written expression and grammar. . It is well structured, coherent, with logical organisation..    The analysis is professionally presented, and is well structured, coherent, with a logical organisation, and high standards of written expression and grammar.
The analysis is generally clearly structured and coherent with clear standards of written expression. The document is substantially free of spelling and grammatical errors.
The analysis has some structure and coherence. The written expression is at times unclear and/or there are some grammatical problems.    Analysis is poorly structured, poorly written, and lacks coherence. Spelling and grammar is poor.
Use of sources and referencing

Weighting:5/40    Well-judged and well-integrated selection of a quality range of sources to support content; all sources appropriately acknowledged; referencing consistently accurate    Good number and range of quality sources, mostly critically integrated; all sources appropriately acknowledged; high level of accuracy in referencing.    Adequate number of sources with attempt to give a range and critically integrate; all sources acknowledged; only minor inaccuracies in referencing.    Adequate number of sources though range may be restricted, and sources not always well integrated; some instances where failure to acknowledge sources is evident; some inaccuracies in referencing    Sources used are insufficient, inappropriate, or uncritically used; lack of proper acknowledgement of sources; referencing inaccurate.