Nullification represented an extreme form of states’ rights. Which argument do you find more compelling – Jackson’s or Calhoun’s? Do you see any connections between the Nullification issue/arguments of the 1830s and the actions of states such as Arizona or Alaska today?

(You need not discuss the present day attempts at nullification of federal law by Republican state legislatures, but you may bring it into the discussion if you wish).

At least 5 to 6 setences with actual facts and reasoning as to why you choose either Jackson or Calhoun.

With a clear thesis.