Mr Robinsons’ mysterious case by Bartlomiej Strzelec

Meet The Parents Film Analysis through Evring Goffman’s Key Concepts
May 10, 2020
A THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL OVERSIGHT IN ISLAM AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN SAUDI ARABIA?
May 10, 2020

Mr Robinsons’ mysterious case by Bartlomiej Strzelec

Mr Robinsons’ mysterious case
GRADEMARK REPORT FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

35

Instructor
Strengths: 1. Focus on scenario 2. Attempt to address clinical and biochemical features 3. Some focus on pathophysiology of ulcers and other problems.

/0

Areas to improve: 1. Try to look at the bigger picture €“ all the signs and symptoms point to a particular direction and even if one or two are close the rationale needs to be presented and made clear. 2. Add more depth to the discussion €“ the analysis needs to focus on pathophysiology and the change and adaptations of the body to that. These will link to the signs/symptoms. Show potential pathologies and using the clues which are to be eliminated and which are possible and need further investigation. Your Q3 was not a natural deduction form the discussion prior to that €“ it seems you cannot link up clinical, laboratory and then pathology €“ which is unfortunate. This is evident in the choice of investigations too quite random. 3. You need to focus on what is a cause and what is a sign/feature and then link to a pathological process €“ do not add or make up aspects of the scenario, this makes it more confusing for you and me!! 4. You have used a range of literature sources and some are pertinent but some are quite odd €“ books on paediatric problems €“ why? This does seem rather random.

Sheila

PAGE 1 PAGE 2

Comment 1
what does this mean?

Comment 2
why?

Comment 3
i do not see how

Comment 4
breaths

Comment 5
So in summary what is occuring?
PAGE 3

Comment 6
Is this now Q2??

Comment 7
rationale?

Comment 8
Unclear what this means
PAGE 4

QM

Ref style incorrect
Ref style incorrect

QM

Sp.
Spelling error

Comment 9
VERY confused comments

Comment 10
again €“ meaning unclear

Comment 11
Confused
PAGE 5

Comment 12
how is this deduced form the discussion above €“ unclear HEART is mentioned so many times then this is a tangential thought

Comment 13
even though he drinks moderately

Comment 14
rationale for this conclusion?

Comment 15
this is an aetiology €“ what trauma causing what?

Comment 16
how is this evident? What purpose does the reference have?

Comment 17
Does Q4 begin here?
PAGE 6

Comment 18
when did this happen?

Comment 19
Not very focused series of tests
PAGE 7

QM

Relevence?
relevence?

QM

Relevence?
relevence?

PAGE 8

RUBRIC: BMS2513 PBQ SUMMATIVE 2014

1.40 / 5

ACCURACY (25%)
1-4 (5)

2/5 Appropriate and correct information included in the answer: 1. Gave the correct rationale for tests 2. Gave the correct diagnosis 3. Gave the correct pathophysiological explanations 4. Gave the most appropriate confirmation tests Three criteria met normally.

5-8 (4) 9-12 (3) 13-16 (2) 17-19 (0)

Two criteria met normally.

One criterion met normally.

None met.

CLARITY (25%)
1-4 (5) 5-8 (4) 9-12 (3) 13-16 (2) 17-19 (0)

2/5 Clarity and Breadth: 1 Clear logical and 2 unambiguous presentation within the word limit 3. All relevant information identified and 4. covered adequately in the answers Three criteria met normally.

Two criteria met normally.

One criterion met normally.

None met.

PROB SOLVING (30%)
1-4 (5) 5-8 (4) 9-12 (3) 13-16 (2) 17-19 (0)

0/5

Problem solving skills: Systematically identified by a process of elimination: 1. Cause(s) of the condition(s) 2. Name(s) of the condition(s) Systematically identified by a process of elimination: 1. Cause(s) of the condition(s) or 2. Name(s) of the condition(s) and Identify other unsystematically. Identify: 1. Cause(s) of the condition(s) 2. Name(s) of the condition(s)

Identify: Either 1. Cause(s) of the condition(s) Or 2. Name(s) of the condition(s) only

Identify niether

REFERENCE (20%)

2/5

1-4 (5)

Referencing: 1.Accurate and complete reference list 2. Accurate reference style used to cite references in text 3. References used to support ideas or develop an argument. 4. Use adequate number of references which are mainly primary sources- more than 10 references Three criteria met normally.

5-8 (4) 9-12 (3) 13-16 (2) 17-19 (0)

Two criteria met normally.

One criterion met normally.

For citation guidelines, please refer to the table in the APA Style section of the syllabus