Its in order description, subject name is environmental politics and management, based in melbourne

Connections to Ben & Jerry’s Case part 2
August 29, 2020
Nursing care of a patient with altered urinary and renal function
August 29, 2020

Its in order description, subject name is environmental politics and management, based in melbourne

Its in order description, subject name is environmental politics and management, based in melbourne
Order Description
Aim:
The Task:
Using scholarly sources, prepare an essay that does the following:

1. Select an environmental conflict:

• You should ensure that there is sufficient tension in this conflict such that there are divergent views from a range of actors
• You may use the same one as your stakeholder map (see “Overlap” note below);

2. Using two or more of the conceptual themes of the course explain:
(a) why is there a conflict and how is the conflict constructed and understood (33% of marks)
(b) what are some of the key options/solutions discussed by stakeholders to address thee conflict and why do you think they have been chosen (33% of marks)
(c) what you think the best response is to the conflict and why (draw on scholarly sources or theories to support this) (34% of marks).

Additional Details
The conceptual themes of the course were laid out in Weeks 1-4 of the lectures and are:
1) Knowledge (social construction of environmental problems)
2) Actors and Agency
3) Political economy and institutions
4) Governance
You might consider explaining the following (this is not an exhaustive list):
• Who are the key actors in the environmental conflict;
• How do different actors frame the environmental issue in different
ways and the effects of this;
• The assumptions and values that underpin these framings;
• The social, cultural, political or economic structures or institutions
that shape the conflict;
• The strategies for governing the problem that have been tried and
new approaches that might enable better outcomes;
• The values and goals that underpin the proposed solutions;
• Who stands to win and lose from past and proposed response/s;