International Public administration

Monitoring And Evaluation
January 6, 2020
Procedural Law And The Bill Of Rights
January 6, 2020

International Public administration

International Public administration

Most people perceive international public administration to be a set of state structures, institutions, and processes. Opponents of globalization argue that it weakens states, making it difficult for them to sustain social welfare and environmental policies, and create fiscal redistributive initiatives.

According to James Bovard, a libertarian author who focuses on writing about government, proponents and businesses seeking to expand a broad claim there is little or no evidence of national governments’ decline. Congress, along with many policy strategists, seem to think that whatever the effects of globalization on governments, they are likely to be beneficial for long-term economic growth (Bovard, 1987).

Analyze the claims laid out in this controversy, and try to argue the strongest case you can in favor of the view(s) you find most convincing. In doing so, be sure to seriously consider the case that your opponents might make against your position, and why you would reject it. Use the Internet and / or Strayer databases to research evidence that supports your opinion. Determine your point of view on the issue, and support your position with information from at least three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references, published within the last five (5) years.

Create a PowerPoint presentation that covers the following:

· Provide a brief description of the issue.

· Present evidence that supports both sides of the argument.

· In the note section of each information slide, you must write a narrative of what you would say if you were giving your presentation in person.

· Provide at least three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references published within the last five (5) years at the end of your video.

Your presentation should include a minimum total of 16 slides:

· 14 information slides

· Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:

a.

7. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

7. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

7. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

. Analyze the core controversies, theories, and rationale surrounding global public

. Formulate domestic and international public policy alternatives and arguments.

. Use technology and information resources to research issues in international public administration.

· Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 140

Assignment 2: Debate It PowerPoint Presentation

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Supplied a narrative in the note section of each information slide describing what the student would say if he or she were presenting in person.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely included a narrative in the note section of each information slide.

Partially provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide.

Satisfactorily provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide.

Thoroughly provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide.

2. Present evidence that supports both sides of the argument. Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely presented evidence that supports both sides of the argument.

Partially presented evidence that supports both sides of the argument.

Satisfactorily presented evidence that supports both sides of the argument.

Thoroughly presented evidence that supports both sides of the argument.

3. Presentation flows smoothly and in a logical pattern.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit presentation, or presentation has no flow and follows no logical pattern.

Presentation is somewhat organized and logical. Needs much improvement.

Presentation flows well and logically. Minor improvement required.

Presentation flows extremely well and logically. No improvement needed.

4. Presentation includes the correct number of slides (12).

Weight: 10%

Did not submit any slides.

Submitted between 4 and 7 of the minimum required number of slides.

Submitted between 8 and 12 of the minimum required number of slides.

Presented more than the 12 of the minimum required number of slides.

5. No spelling errors. No grammar errors. Text is in authors’ own words.

Weight: 10%

Many spelling errors and/or text is copied.

Some spelling errors. Some grammar errors. Most of text is in authors’ own words.

Few spelling errors. Few grammar errors. Text is in authors’ own words.

No spelling errors. No grammar errors. Text is in authors’ own words.

6. Includes three (3) references

Weight: 10%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.