international peacekeeping and humanitarian intervention

Feel free to choose one based on the guidelines i pasted in the “paper requirements” section below
June 11, 2020
Negative/Bad News Messages
June 11, 2020

international peacekeeping and humanitarian intervention

international peacekeeping and humanitarian intervention

Order Description
(Using Weiss and any other readings, write an essay that discusses the relationship between the rise of “human security” and the rise of the human rights and especially international peacekeeping and humanitarian intervention. How do these ideas and policies work together and how does time and context impact the development of these ideas. What might account for a trend toward peacekeeping and humanitarian intervention and ultimately the human security of R2P? What difficulties does the existing system present to a real R2P/human security motivated international intervention (PEACEKEEPING) regime? )
ANSWER THE QUESTION IN A THESIS DOMINATED, WELL-WRITTEN, CONCEPTUALLY AND EMPIRICALLY INFORMED ESSAY. USE THE FULL RANGE OF COURSE MATERIALS THAT HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED/PROVIDED. DO NOT USE ANY OTHER RESOURCES EXCEPT FOR THE ONE I WILL UPLOAD FOR YOU, THEY ARE 5 RESOURCES. THERE IS NO RIGHT OR WRONG ANSWER TO THESE QUESTIONS, BUT YOU SHOULD MAKE AN ARGUMENT OR CLEAR THESIS IN YOUR ESSAY.

QUOTES OR CITATIONS SHOULD BE PARENTHETIC WITHIN THE BODY OF THE PAPER: EXAMPLE (DURCH pp. 5-6, or WENDT, p. 25.)

Use these steps in the paper please:-
I. THESIS: Argument—what the paper will do and say in the space allotted. This must relate to the central argument of the readings or to a specific (MAKE THIS CLEAR) argument in a reading. In other words, you are arguing for or against (against is always more fun…) an argument made in the reading. It should be clear what that is. PARAGRAPH
II. LOGIC of the argument as suggested by the readings and your understanding of them. This is the “causal tale” that quickly and efficiently lays out the logic of your argument. BE CONCISE. Could be 1-2 PARAGRAPHS
III. EVIDENCE to support your argument, as gleaned from the readings and possibly information FROM THE CLASS (readings at least 75%) 2-3 PARAGRAPHS
AND/OR
IV. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES of your and/or the central argument of the book—can include counter arguments. 2-3 PARAGRAPHS
V. CONCLUSION—PARAGRAPH