Explanations for the presence of the enlarged gender pay gaps in Egypt’s private organisations and the degree to which it affects the Labour Market?
The project report should be 8000 words, the rest of the words should be in the appendix with a questionnaire similar to the sample paper I attached.
1. I would like you to research in depth on favouritism, cronyism and on how lower wages for women discourages them from entering the labor market(certain firms), because with low wages; they are forced to use cabs and public transportations which they usually get sexually harassed in them ( mentions examples of cases and figures ).
2. Follow the guidelines in the documents regarding using books and journals in the dissertation.
3.There should be an SPSS
4.The feedback I received for my 1st proposal not the one I attached (One of the learning outcomes (in the study guide) says this: “Drawing on the literature in the field, analyse and interpret research evidence of a managerial and/or organisational phenomenon in order to identify a suitable management research problem/issue or opportunity to explore”. Then, and only then, can you/anyone do the following. “Having identified a suitable research problem/issue or opportunity, design and implement a research investigation/study, use suitable research methods, appropriately justified”. You have got a reasonable amount of literature here. But, there is a major problem here. What? That we already know the answer to this question (the ‘gap’ has already been ‘filled’). How so? In no country in the world is there no ‘gender pay gap’, including the country in question (Egypt). And, your own proposal tells us this, on page 3 (“there is a massive pay gap”). If we already know the answer, we do not need a study. The “aims and objectives” are, really, ‘the literature that I’m going to read’. None of these are “a suitable management research problem/issue or opportunity to explore”. So, you will need to go back to the literature and find a suitable ‘gap’. You say that you will be using secondary data. Perhaps. But, with no SMART questions/hypotheses as yet, it is too early to say. Do not use the ‘I’ word in any formal document, by the way. Do not use ‘we’ (there is only one of you). The “timetable” is not a timetable at all, so it is not possible to say whether or not things are going to be done either in the right order or at the right time prior to the submission deadline. Finally, the references. Most contain one kind of error or another. Here are some (but there are likely others). Do not use first names. Put in volume and issue (in some you are missing one of these). Either either ‘vol 3’ or ‘(3)’ but not both (you need consistency in these things). Put them in alphabetical order. Spelling, grammar and punctuation needs to be corrected throughout the proposal. Keep the language scientific, ‘cool’ (so, for example, do not use “unbelievably massive”, page 3). Why? It is a formal, scientific piece of writing and such ‘flowery’ language is not appropriate. This now concludes my feedback.)
4. explore for a solution for each issue (SMART criteria)
Finally follow the feedback and if you need anything message me.