Source Evaluations: After completing the weeks readings, select 2 sources that will be used. Compose a minimum one page evaluation of each source. Include the documentation style in the heading. After formatting the source, use the headings below to create your evaluation. (Use https://owl.english.purdue.edu/ to format sources.)Credible Author: Explain how or why the author should be considered an expert.Reliable Publisher: Who is the publisher? What is the publishers reputation? Has this source been published by a scholarly or peer-reviewed press? Is this source available in trusted archives, such as subscription databases? If this is from a website, how stable is that website?Accuracy: Is the information accurate? (Do not use the phrase . . . seems to be accurate . . .) Does the information correspond with or contradict information found in sources known to be reliable? Has the information been peer-reviewed? Is there a reference list available to verify the information? Are there any factual errors, statistical flaws, or faulty conclusions?Current Information: Is the material up to date? If it is from a website, when was it last updated?Objectivity (Bias): Are all sides of the issue/topic treated fairly? Is bias detected? (For instance, is the author connected to any institution or foundation that might be paying him/her, which could suggest bias?The 2 sources selected are:1. Special edition: Chikungunya and Zika virus. (2014, October). Retrieved February 17, 2016, from www.eurosurveillance.org: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/ET/V19N02/V19N02.pdf2. Berg, B. L. (2004). qualitative research methods for social sciences. Boston: Pearson.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2016, February 12). Transmission. Retrieved February 17, 2016, from www.cdc.gov: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/transmission/index.html