Assessment Details;

Annotated bibliography

Compile a bibliography (about 1,200 words) of 10 particularly useful sources that approach the topic from different angles, providing different sorts of information and/or different sorts of interpretation.

Give a brief account of the information each provides; why each source is worth including; how the various sources relate to each other and information was not provided by your sources that you think would be desirable for a better understanding of the topic. Only use academically credible sources, and unless you are doing a historical topic, use only sources published since 2000. Include at least 2 books, and 4 journal articles.

Criteria used to grade this task;

Marking guide

Task Assessor Lecturer
Suggested time to devote to this task;

6 hours

Submission details week 11
Feedback and return of work. Available in Moodle after week 12

Sequence:

As semesters and contact hours vary between teaching locations, delivery is usually scheduled across three hours a week for 12 weeks. As the University offers many programs in a variety of formats please contact local lecturers for further information about the schedule.

Appendix 2 Annotated bibliography rubric
Assignment 3 –

Maximum marks – 30

Assignment 3 – Annotated Bibliography:
Assessment Criteria Grade Mark
Bibliographic Information At least 10 annotated resources are cited accurately, are consistent with the APA referencing style and error free. 5
4-6 annotated resources are cited accurately and are consistent with the APA referencing style with less than 5 errors. 3-4
Less than 4 annotated resources are cited accurately and are consistent with the APA referencing style with less than 5 errors. 1-2
Citations are inconsistent with APA style. 0
Annotation Summary Citation summaries comprehensively, accurately and clearly articulate the main argument(s) or ideas presented by the author(s). 9-10
Citation summaries concisely and accurately articulate the main argument(s) or ideas presented by the author(s). 7-8
Citations are adequately summarised with sufficient articulation of the main argument(s) or ideas presented by the author(s). 5-6
Citation summaries do not articulate the main argument(s) or ideas presented by the author(s) accurately or clearly. 2-4
Citation summaries are not evident. 0-1
Annotation Evaluation Citations are comprehensively evaluated with clear articulation of the usefulness, reliability, and objectivity of the author(s). 9-10
Citations are accurately evaluated with clear articulation of the usefulness, reliability, and objectivity of the author(s). 7-8
Citations are adequately evaluated with sufficient articulation of the usefulness, reliability, and objectivity of the author(s). 5-6
Citations are not adequately evaluated with insufficient articulation of the usefulness, reliability, and objectivity of the author(s). 2-4
Citation evaluations are not evident. 0-1
Annotation Reflection Citation reflections are insightful, comprehensive, and consider the relevance of other citations. 5
Citation reflections are clear and consider the relevance of other citations. 4-3
Citation reflections are inadequate, unclear, and/or do not consider the relevance of other citations. 2-1
Citation reflections are not evident.

Total (will be scaled to 30% of final grade)
0
30
find the cost of your paper
Is this question part of your assignment?
Place order
Posted on May 23, 2016Author TutorCategories Question, Questions