Introduction

            In proprietary security, companies take responsibility to employ and train their own workers to provide safety measures to the assets of the company. In contract security, most of the organisations give the responsibility of providing security to other different agencies. The issue of security is a great concern in many companies but these companies’ greatest challenge comes when deciding on which security to apply; whether to use contract security or proprietary security. The corporation considers the cost of employing security and the worth of the provided services by the purveyor. Mostly, services provided by the contract security have been proven to be reasonably priced that those provided by the proprietary security.

However, proprietary security personnel prove to execute their services better in numerous companies. Proprietary securities have time and again proven their worth added security services to different companies. Some examples of these security services include: security awareness training, security appraisal and discussion, and security training services for workers who are operating in non-security units. Contract securities on the contrary are less concerned with matters of addition of value in their services because they there is no price to pay for their delivery of poor services. Whenever a company is employing either of the two securities, it should take into account the kind of security that kowtow to the objectives and the purpose of the company.

Contract versus Proprietary company security

Contract and proprietary security companies are accountable when it comes to guarding companies and ensuring the wellbeing of the costumers and the members of staff. Contract Security Company is in command of a proficient security company and its security services are contracted to dissimilar companies. Proprietary security is a bit pricey because the company being rendered the security services pays for benefits and the increased salaries for skilled personnel. Since the proprietary security position is considered to be high, normally it attracts guard of high quality (Vellani, 2007).In contract security company, the wages are a bit low because sick-leave, security uniforms and the benefits of training are all taken care by the service.

The workers of proprietary security normally feel more reliable to a certain company for the reason that they feel solidarity with fellow workers and have a chance for escalation and promotions. At times, the company may possibly add or sack employees and this can bring about problems of job insecurities in a company. Through the use of contract security services however, organizations have that chance to deal with recruitment problems effortlessly and promptly.

Whenever a company needs every day security organization that is supposed to be micromanaged, acquiring daily proprietary security many possibly be the way out. A significant forethought when making a decision on which kind of company to make use of is that nomatter which kind of Security Company one chooses, worker turnover is a probability. In terms of the site, this can be a problem that can affect the wellbeing and the security of the people in that region.

The workforce of proprietary security are mainly trained to the explicit and precise requirements of the company and this helps them in becoming more conversant with the building outline  and also be acquainted with the people who are getting in and out of the administrative centers or the working offices. Due to extremely elevated rate of turnover, security officers in contract security are never given a chance to interact with the workers. This can have an effect on their allegiance and dedication and negatively to the companies’ disadvantage, influence their performance.

When a company settles on using proprietary security, it is accountable for taking the appropriate measure concerning background verifications and also making sure that the candidate has the right training, knowledge and the skills to tackle work of that enormity. When dealing with the contract security company, one is never worried about work training, background verifications or even recruitments; all is dealt with by that company.

Security is very important and especially in places where a large number of people occupy. Contract and proprietary are types of securities that can be used in different companies. In shopping malls for instance, security is very important. Shopping malls seem like they are tightly protected and thought to be secure places to go shopping, for banquet and also leisure but many a times security problems are encountered in those places. Malls have so many features that catch the attention of criminals.

They have so many nice things and the people walking there with lots of funds intensify the criminal’s interest. The reason why shopping malls are prone to unlawful actions is because there are so many people in them and lots of money is flowing. Malls should always be safe and security administrators are accountable when it comes to maintaining security in these malls (Craighead, 2009). Some shopping malls use proprietary security i.e. they hire and train their own unit of security while others use contract security i.e. they contract other security agencies to provide them services.

The work of the security officers is to secure shopping malls and the properties in the mall. Security guards are always in uniform and they can easily be identified but at times these security officers can opt to work surreptitiously. In such cases they do not put on their uniforms, they will dress just like the other purchasers in the mall. They patrol the shopping mall maintaining a presence. Some officers are also allowed to drive around the compound of the mall to ensure that employees in the mall and the customers are safe. It is up to these security officers to identify the possible dangerous areas and act in a valuable and effectual manner.

Security officers are always supposed to maintain peace and have a right to evict a customer who is behaving in a suspicious manner. Proprietary and contract securities have different working guidelines (Purpura, 2007). Security guards are not allowed to arrest people but they can act as instruments of law enforcement. Their primary obligation is however to put a stop to and deter crime. They put in force the regulations of a company to protect the assets and the lives. Propriety company security is better than contract company security because the security officers under propriety security are well trained and have the appropriate knowledge and the skills to do their job.

A trained security officer knows how to handle his/her weapons and knows exactly what to do when security problems arises. He/she knows his/her responsibility and the duty to perform. Some security officers are even encouraged to complete their police qualifications so that they can carry out some special duties properly. Proprietary company security trains their workers on how to execute their work. This is more favorable for instance in the shopping malls because the security officers are skillful in their job.

Although proprietary security is expensive as compared to contract security, it’s effective in carrying out the duties administered. Security officers here are obedient and skillful. Contract company security services’ standards are many at times inadequate because they are never loyal in their work: there is serving of two masters. They lack the company knowledge and the ability to perform. Security officers whether in shopping malls or in other organizations ought to be well trained and they should be good enough to deliver their services.

Propriety company security may be pricey than contract company security but they deliver. They are well trained and their focus is on that company that rendered their cervices (Janoski, 1999). Contract company security is never concerned with the value or the poor services it provides.  Mostly they are not conversant with the aims and the objectives of the company they render services and this can hinder their performance.

Some companies may opt to move from proprietary company security to contract company security and this can bring about instant and noteworthy savings. Nonetheless, this is not always the best way to tackle problems in security department. The company ought to make sure that it comprehends the aim of the program and how altering to a contract company security can further that goal. These should be managed appropriately otherwise the changes can disappoint the company culture and as a result bring about unsettled personnel.

To avoid such errors, the managers of security department are supposed to evaluate the precise requirements and needs of the company, properly calculate the costs, evaluate the market, check the qualifications of the vendor, lay down comprehensible standards and also keep an eye on performance. The needs ad the objective of the company should be considered first. If for instance, the company is not pleased with the services of proprietary, then this move should not be made. The manager of security should ensure that the origin of the security problem is clearly understood Analysis of expenditure must also be carried out before switching to contract company security (Green, 2004). Security experts mainly struggle with this query of what security to use but the most significant query to focus on is whether that chosen program is focusing on the needs of the company and whether that program can meet the demands of the security management of that company.

Conclusion

Whether proprietary company security or contract company security, programs that mostly fail do not focus on the expectations of the company’s management and they are not appropriately supervised and directed by the security manager. The security manager should always make sure that the security chosen to be used will perform its duties properly. The company’s performance is very significant and therefore it should not be affected by poor delivery of security. A proper plan of training security officials should also be accentuated to increase adeptness in security officers and also to boost their confidence. This in-turn enhances the consumers’ satisfaction and they give the company their confidence; it’s important for a company to earn respect and trust from its customers. People like to be attended by individuals who know what they are doing and those who appear certain and proficient in what they do.

References

Craighead,G. (2009). High-Rise Security and Fire Life Safety. London. Butterworth-          Heinemann

Fischer, R., Janoski, R. (1999). Loss prevention and security procedures: practical            applications for contemporary problems. London. Butterworth-Heinemann

Purpura, P. (2007). Security and Loss Prevention: An Introduction. London. Butterworth-            Heinemann

Robert J. Fischer., Gion, G. (2004). Introduction to security. New York. Butterworth-        Heinemann

Vellani, H. K. (2007).Strategic security management: a risk assessment guide for             decision makers. London. Butterworth-Heinemann