Responsibility to Animals must contain a clear thesis statement you should not merely present the strengths and weaknesses of each theory but must argue that one theory is better or worse than the others in this case please have the title and reference pages) moral justification for denying moral consideration to animals. Can you think of a good moral reason why our moral consideration should include all humans, even those without the ability to reason yet denied to all non-human animals (some of whom have that ability)? What response might he have to your way of drawing the line between the types of beings that should get moral consideration and those that should not? And please No Plagiarism