Write a comprehensive review and critique of this article

 

 

 

Order Description

 

 

2. Find the following article online under Lessons on WTClass

Blair, R.D. and Kaserman, D.L. (1991), The economics and ethics of alternative cadaveric

organ procurement policies, Yale Journal on Regulation, Vol. 8, No. 403.

3. Assume the editor of a journal has sent you this paper to review to determine whether he or

she should allocate valuable journal space to it. Write a comprehensive review and critique of

this article.

a. Your paper should be in APA 6th edition format. Please see

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ for guidelines on how to format

an APA 6th edition paper. The only guideline you can skip is the inclusion of an abstract.

To be clear, your paper does not need to have an abstract. Please follow all of the

other guidelines.

b. The first section of your paper should summarize and explain the author’s main

arguments , as well as the support the author provides for those arguments.

c. The second section of your paper should evaluate the author’s arguments , being sure to

cite the strengths and weaknesses you find. That is, what did the authors do well (and why

is it right), what didn’t they do well (and why isn’t it the best approach), what could they

have done differently, etc€¦

i. Do not simply give me your opinion. Do your research, and back your

statements up with resources, making sure to cite those references.

ii. Back up at least two of these strengths and/or weaknesses with additional

research. They must be articles that were not already cited by the authors

(Blair & Kaserman).

iii. Be sure to cite these references, both in the text and in the bibliography,

according to APA 6th edition style.

d. In addition to the review and critique described in parts b and c, in the third section of your

paper, elaborate on the ethical dilemma discussed in the Blair & Kaserman article. That is,

what is the right thing to do, and why. Remember, do not just give me your opinion.

Back your statements up with resources, being sure to cite them.

i. Cite at least three references, two of which must be articles that were not already

cited by the authors (Blair & Kaserman).

ii. Be sure to cite these references, both in the text and in the bibliography, according

to APA 6th edition style.

e. Don’t forget to suggest to the editor whether or not the journal’s audience would

appreciate the article in your conclusion; i.e. should the editor publish it or reject it.

4. Below are a few sources containing information about writing a critical review and writing

well. Take a look at these prior to writing your paper.

https://student.unsw.edu.au/writing-critical-review

https://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/

https://ctl.utsc.utoronto.ca/twc/sites/default/files/CritReview.pdf

https://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2006/10/how-to-write-well.html

Please do not quote unless absolutely necessary. It is generally better to provide the

information in your own words and cite the source.

Finally, please be sure to proofread your paper, and if possible, have someone else proofread

it, as it is often difficult to catch your own mistakes after having spent so much time with it.

6. You will be scored according to the rubric on the next page.

7. To be clear, your paper must have at least 5 references to 5 separate sources (2 of the

references need to be concerning the author’s strengths and weaknesses and 3 of the

references need to be concerning the ethical dilemma). Each reference needs to be cited

within the paper. It is not enough to just throw 5 references into a reference list at the end of

your paper and never mention the 5 references or never cite them within the body of your

paper. The 5 references need to be actively included in the body of your paper.