Write a three to four (3-4) page court opinion in which you rule on this case.

Identify and discuss three principle causes of current barriers to removal of the restrictive provisions for APN.
July 26, 2020
Family Law
July 26, 2020

Write a three to four (3-4) page court opinion in which you rule on this case.

Write a three to four (3-4) page court opinion in which you rule on this case. In preparing this opinion, you must:Decide whether this court should hear this case or dismiss the case and direct the parties to binding arbitration in accordance with the Retail Buyers Order. Support your response.Note: Please read the facts of the case very carefully as you attempt to resolve this issue.
Decide whether or not a contract exists between the Masons and R&G. Support your response. Note: Be sure that you analyze the facts to reach your conclusion. Merely stating your conclusion without a supporting legal analysis is not sufficient.
Decide one (1) of the other remaining issues presented above. That is, decide whether R&G committed the tort of conversion with the 1990 van, or whether the Masons were unjustly enriched by the use of the new car, or whether the Masons committed fraud and should be estopped from recovering the value of the van.
Use at least two (2) quality academic or legal resources in this assignment, such as a government Website, Law school Websites, Restatements of laws, and other treatises of Law. Your paper must include internal citations indicating the sources of your legal statements.