whateverOrder Descriptionmust read The Presence of Others P178-189, KNOW Carters three steps to integrity are a good judge of consistency between beliefs, speech and action, it does not have any way to address the fact that people often have very different views of right and wrong. In these cases when we might disagree with someone over what is right and still consider this person to be acting with integrity. BUt there are also cases when we disagree with oner what is right and question that persons integrity. Add 4th step to determine whether someone we disagree with is acting with integrity. Use three articles in the Ethics section ( The Rules about the Rules+ two others) to critique Carters definition of integrity. you also can use P184-188 and p198-202.