Teacher Work Sample Part Two
Misook Marcus
C360 – TWS in English Language Learning
Western Governors University
February 27, 2015
Dean Janitzki
Teacher Work Sample Unit
Courtesy of Taskstream (2015)
VITAL INFORMATION
Subject(s)
ESL, Reading
Grade/Level
Grade 9, Grade 10, Grade 11, Grade 12
Time Required
Approximately Six Weeks (Four 45-minute lessons and one 30-minute lesson per week.)
Objective(s)
– Students can participate in discussion sessions after the class reads each section or chapter actively. Students will share at least three opinions or facts of each section or chapter they will read.
– Students will read the storybook fluently during class. Students will perfect their reading aloud skills by participating in popcorn reading or round robin reading sessions.
– Students will use the vocabularies and idioms fluently in real life after they learned these facts through many vocabularies and idioms review sessions in class. Students can use these learned facts without hesitation in real life conversations.
Goal(s)
– I can understand the context of the storybook.
– I can read the storybook text fluently without any hesitation.
– I can apply the vocabularies and idioms that frequently appear in the storybook in real life communication without too much trouble.
Topic(s)
Sibling rivalry, middle school life at home, at school, and in social settings, and teenage love.
IMPLEMENTATION
Learning Activities
This unit contains 19 sessions of reading each of the 19 sections of the storybook and solving study guide questions. This unit contains four review sessions of vocabularies, idioms, and keywords. This unit contains three viewing sessions of video clips related to the storybook. This unit contains five special lessons learning about new facts related to the storybook.
<Section Reading and Study Guide Questions>
<Review Sessions of the Vocabularies, Idioms, and Key Words>
<Viewing of Video Clips Related to the Storybook>
<Five Special Lessons Learning About New Facts Related to the Storybook>
Then there are two sessions where the children will take tests. During the first one, the children will take a pre-test. During the second one, they will take a post-test. Both will last about 30 minutes long.
Resources and Unit Handouts
The storybook Who Put That Hair In My Toothbrush? by Jerry Spinelli, the Study Guide worksheets (19 total), the laptop, the projector, PowerPoint presentations (Vocabularies and Idioms Review, French Cruller, Dimples, Key Words Review, and Wayne Gretzky), Worksheets (Vocabularies and Idioms, Ice Hockey, and Conestoga), pre-test, post-test, and Video Clips (Lacrosse, Halley’s Comet, and the book summary).
ASSESSMENT & STANDARDS
Standards
UT- Utah Core Curriculum Standards (2013)
Subject: English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
Grade: Grades 9–10 students:
Content Area: English Language Arts
Strand: Reading Standards for Literature
Domain: Key Ideas and Details
Standard:
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
Standard:
Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
Standard:
Analyze how complex characters (e.g., those with multiple or conflicting motivations) develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme.
Domain: Craft and Structure
Standard:
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language evokes a sense of time and place; how it sets a formal or informal tone).
Standard:
Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, flashbacks) create such effects as mystery, tension, or surprise.
Standard:
Analyze a particular point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature.
Domain: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
Standard:
Analyze the representation of a subject or a key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is emphasized or absent in each treatment (e.g., Auden’s “Musée des Beaux Arts” and Breughel’s Landscape with the Fall of Icarus).
Standard:
Analyze how an author draws on and transforms source material in a specific work (e.g., how Shakespeare treats a theme or topic from Ovid or the Bible or how a later author draws on a play by Shakespeare).
Domain: Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity
Standard:
By the end of Grade 9, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, in the grades 9–10 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. By the end of Grade 10, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, at the high end of the grades 9–10 text complexity band independently and proficiently.
Grade: Grades 11–12 students:
Content Area: English Language Arts
Strand: Reading Standards for Literature
Domain: Key Ideas and Details
Standard:
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
Standard:
Determine two or more themes or central ideas of a text and analyze their development over the course of the text, including how they interact and build on one another to produce a complex account; provide an objective summary of the text.
Standard:
Analyze the impact of the author’s choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g., where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed).
Domain: Craft and Structure
Standard:
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone, including words with multiple meanings or language that is particularly fresh, engaging, or beautiful. (Include Shakespeare as well as other authors.)
Standard:
Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text (e.g., the choice of where to begin or end a story, the choice to provide a comedic or tragic resolution) contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.
Standard:
Analyze a case in which grasping point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g., satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement).
Domain: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
Standard:
Analyze multiple interpretations of a story, drama, or poem (e.g., recorded or live production of a play or recorded novel or poetry), evaluating how each version interprets the source text. (Include at least one play by Shakespeare and one play by an American dramatist.)
Standard:
Demonstrate knowledge of eighteenth-, nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century foundational works of American literature, including how two or more texts from the same period treat similar themes or topics.
Domain: Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity
Standard:
By the end of Grade 11, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, in the Grades 11–CCR text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. By the end of Grade 12, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, at the high end of the grades 11–CCR text complexity band independently and proficiently.
USA- WIDA English Language Proficiency Standards
Grade Cluster: Grades 9-12
ELP Standard: ELP Standard 2: The Language of Language Arts, Formative Framework
Domain: READING
Level: Level 3 Developing
Indicator: Match cause of influences on familiar people’s lives with effect using visuals and multi-sentence text in small groups
Indicator: Identify evidence of bias in various texts using models or criteria and share with a partner
ELP Standard: ELP Standard 2: The Language of Language Arts, Summative Framework
Domain: READING
Level: Level 3 Developing
Indicator: Match cause of influences on people’s lives with effect using visuals and multi-sentence text
Indicator: Identify main ideas and supporting details related to author’s perspective in visually supported paragraphs
Assessment/Rubrics
This unit has a pre- and post-test. There are no specific rubrics that correspond to the tests. The children will receive number scores, according to the grading scales of Independence High School.
<The Grading Scale> (Independence High School, 2015)
A 100% ~ 93%
A- 92% ~90%
B+ 89% ~ 87%
B 86% ~ 83%
B- 82% ~ 80%
C+ 79% ~ 77%
C 76% ~ 73%
C- 72% ~ 70%
F Below 69%
Copies of Assessment Instruments
Pre-Assessment of the Unit
Courtesy of Marcus (2015)
< Pre-Test of Who Put That Hair In My Toothbrush?> – by Jerry Spinelli
Name: _____________________________________________
Post-Assessment of the Unit
Courtesy of Marcus and Grimshaw (2015)
Name __________________________________
Final Assessment of Who Put That Hair In My Toothbrush?
Pre-Assessment
The pre-assessment has the following intentions. Concerning the first and second learning goals, the first questions of the pre-assessment has the intentions of bringing the children’s attention to the storybook. I hope that the children will use their imagination to predict how the story will unfold as we read the storybook. I hope that the children will show much interest in reading this storybook fluently and understand the entire context after they take this pre-assessment. Concerning the third learning goal, the pre-assessment has some vocabularies and idioms that the children may know already. The pre-assessment has the intentions to see if the children already know a few of these vocabularies and idioms that appear in the book frequently. The pre-assessment has the intentions of helping the students perfect their knowledge of these items by trying to recall their prior knowledge of these and build upon these facts they know already.
Summative Assessment
Concerning the first and second learning goals, the first section of the summative assessment has the intentions of assessing the children’s comprehension of the book after the class finish reading the entire book together. These keywords frequently appear throughout the book. If the children pay attention in class and pay close attention to reading the book aloud in class using the round robin method, the children can read the book without hesitation and fluently. If the children pay attention to the details when reading the book, the children can gather the information needed to fill in the facts that correspond to each keyword. The review session of these keywords at the end of reading the book should help them remember the facts needed to write the answers that correspond to each keyword. Concerning the third learning goal, the second and third sections of the summative assessment have the intentions of testing to see if the children will manage to remember the vocabularies and idioms that often appear in the book. The summative assessment has the intentions to see if the children will be ready to use these items in real life without too much trouble. The following actions may help the children remember these items well. The children must pay attention to the initial session of learning the vocabularies and idioms. The review sessions of these items in different formats such as oral review or solving worksheets throughout the practicum should help the children remember them. The review sessions of these items while reading the book when these items show up should help the children remember them.
References
Independence High School. (2015). The grading scale. Provo, UT.
Marcus, M. (2015). Pre-test of who put that hair in my toothbrush?. Orem, UT.
Marcus, M., & Grimshaw, J. (2015). Final assessment of who put that hair in my toothbrush? . Provo, UT.
Spinelli, J. (2000, April). Who put that hair in my toothbrush?. New York, NY: Little, Brown Books for Young Readers.
Taskstream. (2015). Teacher work sample unit. Retrieved from https://www.taskstream.com/Main/main_frame.asp
Taskstream. (2015). Utah ELA 9th – 12th standards. Retrieved from https://www.taskstream.com/Main/main_frame.asp
Taskstream. (2015). WIDA standards. Retrieved from https://www.taskstream.com/Main/main_frame.asp