Part 1

1a) How effective is the current election process in upholding the democratic right of one voter in the United States?

1b)

One
vote matters in determining the outcome of the election, which is the true founding spirit of democracy.

The election outcome will not represent the wishes of individual voters

It is imperative to vote because one vote will not make any difference on the outcome, implying that democracy will not be possible.

1c) the electoral process does not reflect the wishes of individual voters in an election

Part 2

2a)

Are elected leaders representative of social interests or scoundrels and unscrupulous lot who do anything to get power?

2b)

Most elected leaders in the current society show traits of deceit, power hunger and unfounded promises that gets them to power. This is an exemplification of Hans-Hermann Hoppe theoretical works on democracy, which state that presidents and prime ministers are elected depending on their efficacies in corruption and deceit (Hoppe, 88). In perspective, only the bad people are elected in elections who do not necessarily meet the expectations of the electorates after assumption of office. The theory provides a framework for explaining why most world leaders are found in mega scandals, while seemingly better candidates were not elected in the elections.

2c)

The Obama Campaign’s Digital Masterminds Cash
I
n-New York Times

Who Wants Electoral Competition and Who Wants to Win? -Political Research Journal

2d)

       
The research question addresses the evident deviance of elected leaders in the current age from the voters’ expectations at the time of the election. It is plausible to note that most leaders are willing to follow the law and the moral codes at the time of their campaigns, but turn out very different in the end. It is common to find candidates at the local level who are respectable and loyal to the people, although at higher levels of the federal or national caliber (Clarke , and Brunell 124). This type of leaders tends to be very few. This area is of interest due to the apparent unscrupulous nature of our leaders, mostly engulfed in deceit and corruption that begs the question whether that was the expectation of the voters at the time of the election.

      
The debate takes a rather interesting phase when the example of President George W. Bush is put into perspective, whose reign was marked with deceit and executive secrets, whose traces are still evident in the Obama administration (Rutenberg 68).  Reports show that the campaigners in the 2008 elections cashed in huge amounts after the elections victory, posing serious questions on the source of the money. It is a subject of inquiry into why bad men or corrupt individuals gain competitive advantage in most of the elections. This makes the people vote in individuals who end up gaining questionable integrity and reputation in many public offices in the country.

      
The coverage of the topic in the news media is more elaborate and concise as compared to the academic journal. The academic journal seems to leave out critical and sensitive issues in the debate, which may be the core principles underlying the research in the modern day. In perspective, the academic journal only seems to raise questions on the credibility of the elected candidates, while the new media goes past this point to even point out examples in the federal and presidential elections that elaborate further on the subject matter in question. The academic journal fails to iron out the key issues facing modern social psychology into electing bad leaders.

       
 In perspective, bad leadership is a consequence of wrong voter patterns and the failure to evaluate the leadership that they would want in future. Elections give chances to voters in determining their preferred choice of items, as outlined in the academic journal, but they also give the electorates the responsibility to bear any bad consequences from the leadership as noted by the news media. Although both sources agree with my hypothesis, it is clear that the news media may be trusted to deliver the key point, as well as bring out the key issues in the discussion in a better manner.

2e)

      
The search routine in the study was basically in the art of winning elections. In particular, determination of how candidates in elections win and the trends that have been observed in previous elections. Most URLs offered election reviews and news, however, only a specification of the research yielded a specific answer towards the evident disgruntled society towards their leadership. In perspective, a final search on winning elections in America yielded the required research items that made the study easier and provided the items that formed the basis of the arguments.

Works Cited

Clarke , H D., and T. L. Brunell. “Who Wants Electoral Competition and Who Wants to Win?” Political Research Quarterly 65.6 (2012): 124-125. Web. <http://prq.sagepub.com/search/results?fulltext=how+to+win+election&x=6&y=13&submit=yes&journal_set=spprq&src=selected&andorexactfulltext=and>.

Hoppe, H. Democracy: The God That Failed. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2001. Print.

Rutenberg, J. “The Obama Campaign’s Digital Masterminds Cash In.” The New York Times 45.12 (2013): 67-69. Web. <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/23/magazine/the-obama-campaigns-digital-masterminds-cash-in.html>.

 

.

Click here to get this paper done by our professional writers at an affordable price!!