Summary covers the facts and issues of the case in a comprehensive fashion, making links across the case and health law issues.Consistently exhibits critical thinking, linking the case specific, court finding(s), and overall health law issues.Responses to questions are complete, compre-hensive, and accurateNarrative includes identified headings, page numbers, APA citation style, and is expertly presented and very visually appealing.Narrative is written in third-person in a tight and crisp manner. Overall the paper demonstrates advanced writing skill mastered at the graduate level.
Just write on the Greater Anchorage case study. You must answer these questions: 1.) Are the courts decisions fair? 2.) Would this case have been decided differently if the property had been owned by a for-profit company but leased to the hospital for the same purposes? 3.) What if a daily€“or hourly-fee parking garage used by employees, patients, families, and visitors were located on a parcel of land owned by and adjacent to the hospital property? Would that use be exempt in Alaska or Missouri? Would it matter who accrued the revenue from the parking garage or what fees were charged? 4.) Does your answer change if the garage could also be used by patrons of local businesses that are not related to the hospital? ALL these questions must be answered in the paper.You need to talk about the Nature of a Charitable Corporation, Taxation of Unrelated Business Income, State and Local Property taxes. All of this has to be included in the paper and you must included pertinent material of the laws pertaining to a case like this.