Examine Apple’s current position on the company’s ethical and social responsibilities, and determine whether or not the company has met these responsi
July 9, 2020
Global Company
July 9, 2020

Final Project Paper

Final Project Paper 

Using text readings and class discussions as a guide, the student will create a plan for educational change demonstrating his/her knowledge of appropriate theories, methods, models, procedures and practices.   This paper should be written in Microsoft Word and submitted here in Moodle.    

Planning Paper Rubric

Literature Review:


â—¦  

4 – The literature review contains at least 3 peer-reviewed sources and text citations, appropriately cited within the paper and on the works cited page (APA format).


â—¦  

3 – 2-3 sources have been cited; however correct formatting (APA) has not been used. Some text citations are apparent.


â—¦  

2 – 1-2 sources have been cited within the paper; however they are inappropriate or not correctly cited. No text citations are apparent.


â—¦  

1 – No literature review is apparent or the literature review is not from appropriate (peer reviewed) journals. No text citations are apparent.

  .

Program Description & Context:


â—¦  

4 – The current program/issue has been clearly discussed using rich details in context.


â—¦  

3 – The program description and context are provided with some details included.


â—¦  

2 – While a program description is provided, it does not provide the reader with context and clarity


â—¦  

1 – The program description is not provided within the paper

Needs Discrepancy Analysis:


â—¦  

4 – The NDA is attached to the paper. The paper contains a thorough narrative of the planning process as outlined in the NDA.


â—¦  

3 – The NDA is attached to the paper. The paper contains an adequate narrative of the planning process as outlined in the NDA


â—¦  

2 – The NDA is not attached and/or is described only vaguely within the paper.


â—¦  

1 – The NDA is not attached and/or not described within the paper.

Action Plan:


â—¦  

4 – The action plan is clearly described including a convincing and credible need (1); the driving forces and resisters (2); available resources (3); plans for evaluation (4); and the Gantt Chart (5).


â—¦  

3 – 3-4 components of the action plan are contained within the paper


â—¦  

2 – 1-2 components of the action plan are contained within the paper


â—¦  

1 – Components of the action plan are not clearly apparent within the paper.

Writing:


â—¦  

4 – The writing is exemplary, detailed, and clear.


â—¦  

3 – The writing is adequate, fairly detailed, and relatively clear, with few grammatical and mechanical errors


â—¦  

2 – The writing is adequate, with some detail and some grammatical and mechanical errors


â—¦  

1 – The writing is unclear with little to no text reflection and numerous grammatical and mechnical errors