According to the Progressive reformers what were believed to be some direct and indirect
benefits of direct democracy? With the latter, what does the empirical evidence (research) say
about the initiatives effect on voter education and participation in the political system more
broadly? Be specific by providing examples.
Second, the capability of the American voter has long been debated in the political science
discipline. The central question has been this: do American voters know enough about politics
and government to make good (i.e. rational or in their selfinterest)
choices? The institution of
direct democracy has entered this debate insofar as it asks a lot citizens. It requires voters to
make decisive choices on public policy matters. Its harder to vote on initiatives than, say, to
vote for president or some other elected official. Or so the argument goes. According to the
research can voters make reasoned, rational choices on ballot initiatives? Why or why not?
How do we know? Explain.
Third, I want you to think about the policy effects of direct democracy. Specifically,
what do political scientists mean when they talk of state government policy representation or
responsiveness? (hint: Im not looking for a specific one line definition here) According to the
research are states that use the initiative more or less responsive? Again, use the findings of
the research to support your answer.