Defense Attorneys and Avoiding Tyranny

What errors did the team members make? How could they have improved on their problem-solving process
July 5, 2020
Planning an IT Infrastructure Audit for Compliance 
July 5, 2020

Defense Attorneys and Avoiding Tyranny

Topic: Defense Attorneys and Avoiding Tyranny

The founding fathers crafted a purposeful tension between each branch of government and between the powers exercised by the state and federal systems. The American criminal justice system is a continuation of the foundational belief that a separation of powers, both horizontally and vertically, is essential to ensuring one’s freedom. The role of defense attorney is often misunderstood by the public, but a zealous defense of the accused, even the guilty, is vital to avoiding the onset of tyranny.

Beginning with the Reading & Study material, discuss the practical challenges facing members of the defense bar in each of the areas listed below:

    • Balancing family demands, law practice viability, personal integrity and professionalism.

    • Zealously advocating for rights of the accused, protecting the truly innocent, and ensuring equal justice for the guilty.

    • Compare and contrast the roles of defense attorney with the scriptural depictions of Jesus the Christ as an advocate for the saints throughout Scripture.

  • Answer all of the questions listed in each case study.

  • Incorporate 2 scholarly sources in your original threads, using proper APA formatting.
  •  

    The book for the next question is: Criminal Justice Organizations: Administration and Management 5th edition. By: Stan Stojkovic, David Kalinich, and John Klofas. (2012).

     

    BE SURE TO USE BIBLICAL SCRIPTURE FOR BOTH DISCUSSION QUESTIONS AND AT LEAST 3 SOURCES. BE SURE TO CITE THE SOURCES IN APA FORMAT: ALSO BE SURE THAT BOTH POSTS HAVE MORE THAN 500 WORDS IN BOTH

    2.

    Chapter 3 Case Study – Creating Intelligence Systems in Corrections

    1.      How can communication be improved in an organization that is structured in a traditional bureaucratic form?

    2.      How might computerized communication be utilized to improve the effectiveness of communication in a bureaucratic organization?

    3.      How might computerized communication be ineffective?